data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ef7bb/ef7bbc51ea0d3ca6949f2da77fb73e25bf1a7276" alt="Metaphysics"
Mr. Gold's talk from June 1970 is the final session of a 6 week course on metaphysics he gave at the Sherwood Oaks Experimental College. It began with the opportunity to ask any question on metaphysics and the occult including Gurdjieff's work and legacy, the Universal Mantra and how to work with it, the nature of space and paradoxes of time, the topsy turvey nature of one's beliefs about the world and much more.
The talk is an expansive and dynamic discussion on esoteric philosophy, metaphysics, time, and human consciousness. It explores themes such as the teachings of Gurdjieff and Ouspensky, the nature of time and reality, the function of mantras, and the responsibility of the individual in shaping perception and experience. The lecturer engages in dialogue, challenging assumptions and encouraging deeper reflection on existence, knowledge, and self-awareness.
The discussion often returns to the difference between Gurdjieff and Ouspensky, with an argument that Ouspensky only grasped the mechanical aspects of Gurdjieff’s teachings, failing to embody the deeper, transformative wisdom. There is exploration into the esoteric nature of time, suggesting that existence is not linear but rather a spiraling movement through various states of being. The speaker suggests that different moments in perceived time are interchangeable, meaning one could experience any now as all time.
Another central theme is the relationship between knowledge and perception. The group discusses how the remnants of the "Kundabuffer" (an esoteric concept from Gurdjieff) obscure our ability to see reality as it truly is. This leads into a discussion of mystical concepts like the structure of the universe, the role of mantras, and how an individual's focus can compress or expand time. The talk touches on the illusion of separation between beings and the illusion of fixed identity.
A conversation about the Ouija board serves as an avenue to debate self-perception and the nature of external entities. The group questions if the board is truly answering from an external intelligence or is simply a manifestation of the user’s unconscious mind—leading to broader reflections on the nature of spirits and the self.
The final discussions revolve around the paradox of free will and purpose—whether humans are tools of a greater intelligence or beings with independent agency. The lecturer suggests that awareness of being a tool can lead to mastery over oneself and, ultimately, unity with the greater cosmic intelligence. The nature of existence itself is challenged, reframing the idea of selfhood and perception as mutable constructs that can shift with discipline and awareness.
"An abstract, surrealist philosophical illustration: a timeless, spiraling cosmos where past, present, and future intertwine; an ancient scholar converses with a modern figure beneath floating celestial symbols; a luminous mantra vibrates through multiple dimensions; a veiled entity moves the planchette of an elaborate Ouija board, revealing the universe within; Gurdjieff and Ouspensky depicted in allegorical form — one grounded in rigid structure, the other dissolving into the ephemeral; ethereal light and shadow interplay to suggest hidden knowledge and revelation."