data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e03cc/e03cc1215d210977ed6557fc2daacc322859ce36" alt="The Last Supper"
A provocative pair of Convention dinner talks concerning Work Group invocations, shape shifting, the One Room exercise and the differences between a seance and an invocation.
The talk explores the power of invocation, group dynamics, and the critical role of alignment in esoteric work. The speaker emphasizes that the importance of a discussion lies not in its informational content but in its atmosphere and progression. The talk contrasts invocations with seances, illustrating that invocations serve specific, structured purposes without allowing room for experimentation. It further delves into risks, personal concerns vs. group work, and the necessity of surrendering individual desires for the higher function of the group. Sexual relationships within the work group are dissected in terms of alignment rather than personal gratification. The latter portion explores economic survival and the mindset required for self-sufficiency beyond societal dependence.
The talk begins with observations about how individuals become consumed with personal concerns, limiting their awareness of the broader moment. The speaker stresses that the significance of a discussion is not in "what" is said, but in "how" it is said and how it unfolds, shaping its impact on participants.
Invocation is explored in depth, with key distinctions drawn from seances. While both involve structured technique and group participation, a seance is often done out of curiosity or emotional need, whereas an invocation requires strict intent and discipline. Invocations rely on alignment—both of individuals and the group—to produce effects, whereas seances are more lenient in their structure.
Sexual relationships among group members are examined critically. The speaker suggests that fixation on personal attention and gratification creates dysfunction within work groups. The underlying question of why some members receive more attention than others is reframed as a matter of alignment rather than favoritism or exclusion.
Risk-taking emerges as a recurring theme, particularly in the discussion of livelihood. Engaging in unconventional work involves significant uncertainty, and aligning one’s energy with an unstable but high-stakes path is portrayed as an essential part of the journey. The speaker discourages dependency on societal systems and stresses the importance of self-sufficiency, risk tolerance, and adaptability. Participants are warned that any venture undertaken will likely lead to failure at some point, necessitating new beginnings.
The final sections touch upon illusions of security. Institutional systems, whether in education, employment, or relationships, do not offer permanence. Individuals often unknowingly subscribe to frameworks designed to keep them subdued. The talk challenges participants to recognize their programming and seek true autonomy.
A surreal, atmospheric digital painting of a shadowy gathering in a dimly lit ceremonial chamber. A group of figures sits in a circular arrangement, their faces partially obscured by shifting light patterns. A central figure stands, gesturing as an ethereal, invisible force visibly distorts the air around them. The room is lined with worn tapestries, strange symbols carved into the walls. The mood is tense yet electric, as if something unseen is being summoned or invoked. Light and shadow play dynamically across the scene, giving it an otherworldly, charged quality.