data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3e5a3/3e5a3c952c9d012e5756204bd5a2fbecb28581eb" alt="Fear and Risk"
At the Sacramento Convention, Lee Lozowick and E.J. talk about dying to ordinary life, overcoming fears and the necessity of risk-taking in the school. New Age imitation spirituality is debunked. The kind of attention needed for work, what it means to be in the Work, and making oneself available to receive the teaching are also discussed.
The talk explores themes of attention, training, awareness, and the challenges of personal and collective transformation. It emphasizes the importance of genuine engagement in "the work," the difficulty of maintaining focus, and the tendencies of people to misunderstand or resist deeper truths. There are discussions on the dynamics of learning, the role of discomfort in growth, and the paradox of seeking transformation while clinging to one's habitual patterns. The talk also highlights the complexities of teacher-student relationships, the necessity of perseverance, and the illusion of external balance.
The speaker discusses training the body and mind to respond naturally to stimuli without forcing learned behaviors. They critique intellectualized approaches to attention, emphasizing bodily awareness as a more authentic form of engagement. A key idea is the resistance people have to uncomfortable truths, often seeking comfort in superficial socialization instead of deep learning.
A recurring theme is the role of stress and challenge in personal development—students often work harder under constraint but relax when external pressures are eased, revealing inconsistencies in their commitment. The speaker notes the difficulty of meaningful transmission, emphasizing that most people are not ready for true learning.
Various anecdotes illustrate principles of attention, submission, and mastery. The story of a kitchen boy becoming the successor in a Zen monastery highlights how true understanding transcends formal learning. Judo principles—using submission to gain control—serve as an analogy for engaging with 'the work.'
The talk stresses that discovery and awakening cannot be imposed or taught in a linear way, but must arise naturally within the student. Efforts to artificially accelerate progress often backfire. The difference between intellectual grasp and deep embodiment of knowledge is explored, with the speaker repeatedly challenging listeners to examine their assumptions about learning.
Finally, the speaker warns against mistaking theoretical knowledge for experiential understanding. They caution that the journey toward transformation can be unsettling—requiring one to fully abandon former perspectives—but also reassure that, with patience, a more profound way of being can emerge.
"A surreal, dreamlike scene featuring a lone figure walking a tightrope between two worlds—one side filled with structured, geometric patterns representing rigid intellectualism, the other a fluid, organic landscape symbolizing intuitive awareness. The figure’s posture is ambiguous, caught between balance and submission, as unseen winds of transformation ripple through the image. Muted, moody lighting, with a subtle play of gold illumination hinting at hidden mastery."