data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/83513/835138594dc81ca960d02b2e4071543c3cce84b2" alt="The Essential Self and the Machine"
In this first easaphone conversation between the New York Study Circle and Core Group in California, the nature and behavior of the machine, the chronic and the essential self are explored.
The talk explores the concept of the "machine" as a metaphor for habitual, reflexive functioning in human beings. A key theme is distinguishing between the essential self and the machine, recognizing whether the machine is asleep or awake, and using attention to awaken it. The discussion highlights self-observation, the mechanics of reflexive behavior, and the process of awakening as a gradual, often discomforting transformation. Practical exercises are prescribed, such as gathering evidence of the machine’s sleep without attempting to wake it.
The speaker engages in a dialogue about the nature of habitual human functioning, likening it to a machine that operates reflexively without conscious input. There is an exploration of what defines a machine—whether it is self-activating or requires an operator—and how this concept applies to human behavior and consciousness.
A key distinction is made between the machine (which includes thoughts, emotions, and conditioned reactions) and the essential self (capable only of placing attention). The machine’s dominant state is sleep, characterized by habitual patterns, emotional reflexes, and automatic responses. Awakening the machine involves directing attention toward it, breaking these unconscious patterns.
The discussion draws analogies to Alexander Graham Bell, Thomas Edison, and physiological states like a limb falling asleep and reawakening, illustrating the discomfort involved in awakening the machine. The awakening process is described as a progressive awareness of patterns, followed by moments of increased perception, detachment from reflexive emotions, and, ultimately, a state of "high indifference."
A practical exercise is introduced: participants should keep a rigorous 30-day journal of evidence proving their machine is asleep. This includes direct personal observations, recollections of previous unconscious periods, and external observations from others. The rationale is that once concrete evidence of the machine's sleep is solidified, efforts toward awakening will have greater clarity and impact.
The discussion also highlights the dangers of mistaking an awakened machine for a sleeping one and vice versa, and the possibility of awakening artificially without actual transformation. The final point emphasizes the necessity of applying the knowledge in daily life rather than merely theorizing about it.
A surreal depiction of a mechanical humanoid figure resembling an old automaton, seated in deep contemplation. One half of the figure appears rusted, dormant, and shadowed, representing sleep, while the other half glows with an ethereal inner light, signifying awakening. The machine’s "thoughts" take the form of luminous gears and floating diagrams, evoking transformation. Behind the figure is a vast cosmic landscape with layers peeling away like an onion, symbolizing the gradual unveiling of deeper consciousness. The environment blends a steampunk aesthetic with elements of mysticism and psychological depth, invoking a sense of inner alchemical process.