data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cf3a9/cf3a95c3a25d743b6fcb34f4c2b8d4c813a7eff9" alt="Objective Art"
Lee Lozowick, Menlo Macfarlane, Zoe Alowan and E.J. Gold. This free-wheeling panel discussion on Objective Art includes several definitions and examples of Objective Art and its significances in the transmission of Work ideas.
This discussion on *Objective Art* explores the distinction between subjective and objective art, the role of art as a vehicle for transmission, and the connection between art, esotericism, and personal transformation. The speaker presents two definitions of objective art: (1) art that emits an effect upon contact, capable of transformation beyond individual interpretation, and (2) art created in a state of freedom from "Chief Feature", the dominant egoic trait that distorts perception. The talk examines the nature of transmission in art, the relationship between audience and artifact, and the difficulty of creating genuine objective art. Theatrical performance, sacred architecture, and classical art are discussed as examples of works that bypass personality and speak directly to essence.
This talk is an exploration of the mechanics of objective art, examining how it functions as a tool for transformation rather than a form of self-expression. The discussion critiques modern artistic tendencies, emphasizing the loss of knowledge regarding sacred proportions, symbolic transmission, and the power of art to bypass egoic structures.
The speaker proposes two definitions:
1. Art as an Emitting Artifact – Objective art is capable of affecting consciousness upon contact, producing a predictable, non-subjective response in the viewer.
2. Art Created Free from Chief Feature – True objective art is made when the artist is free from ego and personal distortion, working in a state of presence and alignment with higher laws.
- Objective art transforms, while subjective art entertains.
- Certain artifacts, architecture, and music banish Chief Feature in those who experience them, creating a moment of freedom from conditioned perception.
- Sacred spaces, temples, and manuscripts often contain hidden mathematical and geometric structures that produce energetic effects.
- The speaker discourages most people from attempting to create objective art, stating that it is improbable without significant inner work.
- One must first learn to recognize objective art before attempting to create it.
- True objective art is not the result of intellectual effort but emerges from deep attunement to reality.
- The discussion highlights theater as the most overt form of public magical conjuration.
- Great performances act as open rituals, drawing characters down onto the stage, not just as acting but as a true invocation.
- The role of posture, movement, and presence in conjuring a character is emphasized over intellectual analysis of roles.
- The Ka’aba in Mecca – Described as an artifact with inherent transformative properties, affecting those who pass near it.
- Temples and Sacred Architecture – Some buildings dampen Chief Feature, creating a blank space for direct experience.
- Sacred Manuscripts – Illuminated texts carry energetic imprints that can influence those in proximity, even without reading them.
- The speaker compares objective art to an infection, where only a few individuals "catch" its transmission and begin developing a magnetic center for esoteric work.
- Repeated exposure to objective art strengthens one’s sensitivity to it and fosters transformation.
- Objective art is an act of magic, concealed under a socially acceptable veneer.
- Subjective art is the outer form, while objective art is the hidden essence within the structure.
- Theatrical rituals and esoteric schools have historically used art as a medium for transformation.
- The speaker discusses why objective art is not mass-produced, comparing it to fast food—something gets lost in translation when authentic presence is replaced by mechanical reproduction.
- Even when an objective artifact exists, duplicating it does not guarantee the same effect.
The talk presents objective art as a means of transformation rather than self-expression, distinguishing it from conventional creativity, personal symbolism, or artistic genius. The process of engaging with objective art requires inner work, discernment, and the ability to distinguish transmission from entertainment.
"A surreal composition depicting a massive stone temple, geometrically perfect, glowing with an unseen force, surrounded by timeless artifacts—sacred books, musical instruments, statues—each subtly radiating an unseen energy. In the foreground, a lone figure stands before an ancient theater stage, where shadowy actors are conjuring living archetypes from the void. The atmosphere should convey both mystery and mathematical precision, with subtle golden ratios embedded within the scenery, hinting at hidden structures of transmission. The image should balance the mystical and the architectural, reflecting the precise and transformative nature of objective art."